Stinger226 Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, adam said: ESPN is an absolute joke. New Coaching Staff: Johnson, DC (name a bigger upgrade in the league in the last 5 years?) New FA/Trades: Thuney, Dalman, Jackson, Jarrett (trenches) New Draft Picks: Loveland, Burden, Trapilo (BPA) There is no other team in the NFL that upgraded as much as the Bears did. It is still on paper, but that's what they are grading on. ESPN has the Bears as the 16th best offseason. They are smoking crack. It is all clickbait now. ESPN hates Caleb too. Very true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearFan PHX Posted 9 hours ago Report Share Posted 9 hours ago Another perfect example of how the bloggers and talking heads are full of crap. ESPN is supposed to be a flagship - like a major source. It's BS season, and all the hype is crap. Even if a team turns out to have a great year, what they say about them now has nothing to do with it. The click farmers throw this gruel out there and the fan boys just lap it up. But the reality is coming, and I think the Bears stand a good chance of being great, not in articles, but on the field. But it doesn't happen because of praise, it happens because of hunger, and dedication. hours of hard work and wanting it more than the other guy. In this sense, praise works against your team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, BearFan PHX said: Another perfect example of how the bloggers and talking heads are full of crap. ESPN is supposed to be a flagship - like a major source. It's BS season, and all the hype is crap. Even if a team turns out to have a great year, what they say about them now has nothing to do with it. The click farmers throw this gruel out there and the fan boys just lap it up. But the reality is coming, and I think the Bears stand a good chance of being great, not in articles, but on the field. But it doesn't happen because of praise, it happens because of hunger, and dedication. hours of hard work and wanting it more than the other guy. In this sense, praise works against your team. Yeah, in some of these cases, it is just pure bias. The top 4 teams are west coast, and top to in CA. The Rams were #1, and their best move was retaining Stafford? Like seriously. I should've stopped there. The 2nd team was SF, and their biggest move was resigning Purdy. This has to be random AI stuff, because it makes no sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago I posed the question in a few different AIs and this is what they came up with: GPT - GEM - GROK 1. CHI NE PIT 2. BAL CHI CHI 3. WAS LAR LAR 4. PHI DEN NE 5. PIT MIN WAS So top 2 in all 3 major AIs, which now crawl the web for some consensus (make less stuff up), but somehow the smooth brains over at ESPN think the Bears were 16th? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearFan PHX Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 22 minutes ago, adam said: I posed the question in a few different AIs and this is what they came up with: GPT - GEM - GROK 1. CHI NE PIT 2. BAL CHI CHI 3. WAS LAR LAR 4. PHI DEN NE 5. PIT MIN WAS So top 2 in all 3 major AIs, which now crawl the web for some consensus (make less stuff up), but somehow the smooth brains over at ESPN think the Bears were 16th? they are fools. OR theyre smart and looking for clicks not the truth? either way it's as trashy as the national enquirer. same with PFF. but i dont care - the games are won and lost on the field, and Im so sick of winning the offseason. I used to love the hype, but it has gotten me sick so many times, I just cant anymore. I have no patience for it, whether its pro Bears or anti Bears. I want us to dominate - THAT will be fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 39 minutes ago, adam said: Yeah, in some of these cases, it is just pure bias. The top 4 teams are west coast, and top to in CA. The Rams were #1, and their best move was retaining Stafford? Like seriously. I should've stopped there. The 2nd team was SF, and their biggest move was resigning Purdy. This has to be random AI stuff, because it makes no sense. Dont there broadcasts come with the East and LA? Constant bias. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 35 minutes ago, BearFan PHX said: they are fools. OR theyre smart and looking for clicks not the truth? either way it's as trashy as the national enquirer. same with PFF. but i dont care - the games are won and lost on the field, and Im so sick of winning the offseason. I used to love the hype, but it has gotten me sick so many times, I just cant anymore. I have no patience for it, whether its pro Bears or anti Bears. I want us to dominate - THAT will be fun. Yeah, it is all hot takes now. 29 minutes ago, Stinger226 said: Dont there broadcasts come with the East and LA? Constant bias. Yep, and it is pretty obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 8 hours ago, adam said: ESPN is an absolute joke. They can kiss my ass. ESPN went from sports journalism and reporting to woke politics. They are anti white and anti conservative. I only tune in when there is a game I want to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearFan PHX Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 21 minutes ago, Mongo3451 said: They can kiss my ass. ESPN went from sports journalism and reporting to woke politics. They are anti white and anti conservative. I only tune in when there is a game I want to see. amen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago Did ESPN after alternatives? Who was the better HC candidate we should have signed? Better DC? Better OC? Better LG? Better RG? Better TE maybe they preferred Warren? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.