jason

Prediction. Devante Parker is going to be a bust. Heard his interview earlier and he sounds borderline retarded.

Yes. I whipped it out and grabbed some Jergen's. Then...meh...lost interest.

I didn't say it was realistic...but the value was great.

Didnt it look great last year? If not better?

I hate you. LOL

I hope your second rounder is right.

Giants with a big reach. Wow.

I mean, it is a good pick, but had they just kept Marshall it wasn't really necessary. It is digging a hole then filling it. Keeping BM and picking Shelton makes more sense.

Kinda how i feel, except for the Cutler sentiment. Trade away a pro bowl WR and pick up a rookie. Head-scratcher.

At this point I think Shelton makes the most sense.

FUUUUUUCK. Now it is White.

OMFG! PLEASE JETS...PASS ON WILLIAMS!

This is a great draft thus far. Nevermind...now White is the guy and i dont like it.

YEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSS!!! Whew. That had me worried.

It would be jitters in that he'd be trying to make the big splash, the fancy pick, to prove how smart he is. It is over ambitious, and would cost far too much for a team with so many holes. It reaks of "young manager".

Agreed. Horrible idea unless it is that crazy Manziel move.

EXACTLY. That would be awesome.

Makes me sick.

Make no illusions; you're a Cutler hater. And giving up all that was mentioned originally would be insane. As for the other stuff, the OL was good one year. One. Otherwise the two on the left have aged and degraded, and Mills got much worse. There is a reason Forte always gets hit in the backfield. Drafting a blue chip OL like Peat or Scherff would almost certainly improve the offense byconsiderable margins. Scherff next to Long would be a runner's dream, and something defenses would have to overload against. I have said i dont like or want DL or OLB, but there is certainly uncertainty. And the flaws at S are as you noted; I still think Collins would make a huge impact. Agreed about the second tier QBs. If the Bears want a QB, they should look outside of the 1st.

Then trade back for more? That could be interesting. Trade in to get rid of Cutler? Then trade back out? If the Bears go to 2, I sure hope it is for Williams and not Mariota.

Thats a little closer to tolerable, but still tough to swallow considering all the present issues. 7+Jay+5th+Allen is still a HUGE sum to move up for an unknown. But considering the cap space, maybe it would save enough money to pay one of the FAs still sitting out there. I wouldn't mind kicking the tires on Wes Welker as the slot WR. He would be an excellent compliment to AJ.

Hopefully a smokescreen. Freaking atrocious idea.

So you'd take Away the leadership of the offense, sacrifice the future of the draft, get rid of the nearly career leader in Bears passing records, dump off one of the best RBs in Bears history (not to mention one of the handful of three down backs in the NFL), to get a rookie QB with questionable intangibles off the field who will certainly lose a lot of games with a bad defense and a porous OL? I'd take Winston if he fell to seven and we couldn't trade out.

So, with Cutler and a huge contract, a porous OL, a new defensive scheme with tons of unknowns, definite holes at ILB and S if not also NT and 3-4 DE, an absence at WR now that Marshall is gone, and empirical evidence that trading up is a bad idea in terms of overall value added, yet you STILL want to trade up to get the second rated QB (and some question that because of the scheme) of a weak QB class? That's insane.

HELL NO.