Sure, most of these guys picked after the 3rd will amount to nothing but rarely do you see a team trade down, lose draft capital in the process, then draft a guy they could've gotten later, which dilutes the draft capital even more.
A 5'`11" LB in coverage will be comical.
He was a UDFA, I have not seen a mock have him in any round. Why would they use a 4th round pick on him when they have a 5th and a 7th left. I am not liking this one at all.
Word out of interviews was he was one of the worst, if not the worst they have ever witnessed, all the while he was dictating what the clubs would do for him. Basically a double negative for a guy that was pampered by his dad for his entire college career.
Nope, it was straight up 109 for 132 and 169. The Bills had 4x picks between 169 and 177, so Poles got fleeced here. Poles should've gotten at least 206 (late 6th) too.
Too much of a drop-off after 120.
JJ Chart
109 = 76pts
132 = 40pts
169 = 23.8 pts (63.8 total)
Equivalent to a mid-6th rounder in value/
Using the Rich Hill chart, the Bears lost a late 6th early 7th rounder of value.
I don't like that trade, no matter what trade chart you use, the Bears lost a 6th rounder worth of capital to move back 23 spots in the 4th to pick up a super late 5th.