Everything posted by adam
-
Pick 89, Zavion Thomas, WR, LSU
The way they talked about him, he would be almost exclusively a STer with some gadget plays mixed in. They also signed Raymond, so this again feels like a luxury. I hope he proves me wrong, but I would've rather had competition at Edge and DT earlier in the draft with more accomplished guys than what feels like filling niche roles on the roster.
-
This is Ben Johnson’s team
Look at the list of the top 25 fastest WRs in the NFL, the list is basically 90% garbage, like 2-3 guys actually became decent, but for the most part, none of them could actually do their primary job, run routes and catch balls, they could just run the 40 really fast in shorts. I would rather have tangible production and experience. QB is the same way. Traits guys are cool, but rarely do guys with very low volume ever amount to anything in the NFL. I know the team has to use some metric to evaluate, but when it is strictly athleticism, that doesn't always translate.
-
This is Ben Johnson’s team
I hope I am wrong, but this draft felt too cute. Too much I am smarter than everyone else vibes. I could be wrong, but it just feels that way. A lot of the players were mocked to the Bears, but almost all were a round or even two rounds later. What that means is you are only getting 1-2 starters out of this group when you really need 3-4, especially when you had an extra 2nd rounder. DJ Moore was basically traded for Sam Roush.
-
Bears trade 60 for 69 (3rd) and 144 (5th)
This trade was so bad that the Bears could've gotten a 6th rounder from TEN and the Bears still would've lost the trade.
-
Poles Press Conference from last night
Saying you were just playing the board is basically deflecting potential future criticism. It wasn't my fault, it was how the board fell. That just feels like a cop out to me. The only pick that may have been "BPA" from the 2nd on was Muhammad, and they had to trade up to get him. Van den Berg is a project, which is what the later rounds are for, so I am fine with that pick too. I just didn't like the sequence from 57 - 169. How do you lose value moving back? That is still a head scratcher to me. The Bears paid more to move 5 picks in the late 4th (-4) than TEN did to move up 9 (-21). In the Bears two trades, they lost of the exact value of Pick #166. That is a lot to lose in draft capital in two moves.
-
UDFAs 2026
Moss was Caleb's backup at USC.
-
Draft Summary
Unfortunately this is Poles evaluation criteria. This is why Velus Jones was drafted, why Claypool was traded for. Not actual on the field production. All the events are not even realistic without gear on. A 250 lbs dude can carry more weight with less impact than a 180 lbs dude. It's not like the equipment worn is lighter or smaller for the lighter guys.
-
Draft Summary
I am honestly ok with the picks, but when you consider they came into the draft with 2x 2nd rounders, then traded back and lost value, then traded back up and lost more value. That sequence was not ideal. The other teams got Hill Jr, at 60, Sam Hecht, C at 144, and Will Lee III, CB at 129 for Roush, TE, Muhammad, CB, and Elliott, LB.
-
Kipper’s Grade is Fair IMO
Yeah, I think B- or C+ is what it is for 2026.
-
News Flash, This Just In: Ryan Poles Diagnosed With Dimensia
The Bears lost way too much draft capital in this draft. From my count, they lost a round with Jones, lost a half a round with the trade back, another round selecting Roush, and then at least 2 more rounds with Thomas. That is 4.5 rounds in lost draft capital. That is not nothing. In 2 years, if Jones is the only starter out of Jones, Roush, and Thomas, it will be a bad draft.
-
Day 3 prospects
It almost doesn't matter because the Bears are picking their guys not the consensus guys.
-
Best Available Day 2
Having 4 picks in the top 89 and not getting Edge or DT should be a fireable offense for Poles and the scouting staff. Unacceptable.
-
Pick 89, Zavion Thomas, WR, LSU
Gadget player at 89. What is going on?
-
Bears trade 60 for 69 (3rd) and 144 (5th)
I'm fine with the players but Jones and Roush for 57 and 69 are both huge reaches.
-
Bears draft Sam Roush, TE at 69
The problem with these picks is they are all a round too early. They could've traded 57 and drafted Jones with the later 2nd rounder and got more back. Roush wouldve been there at the Bears real 3rd rounder. Just overall bad draft value. Better players are joining opponents. A TE3 is a luxury pick. You can't use Pick 69 on a luxury pick.
-
Bears draft Sam Roush, TE at 69
Kmet and a 5th for Thibodeaux?
-
Bears draft Sam Roush, TE at 69
Poles has no clue wtf he is doing. You trade out of the 2nd and then draft your TE3 with an early 3rd rounder?
-
Bears trade 60 for 69 (3rd) and 144 (5th)
This sucks, Hill goes to TEN. There is no way the Bears will get a player like that with pick 69 and 144. This is a weak draft, moving back is a terrible idea. This really sucks
-
Bears trade 60 for 69 (3rd) and 144 (5th)
Bears trade back 9 spots to pick up an early 5th. Bad trade value for Bears there. 9 spots that early is worth a mid 4th, should have gotten a 5th and 6th for that move. Poles underwhelming me today.
-
Best Available Day 2
Yeah again, I saw him mocked to the Bears in the 3rd.
-
Best Available Day 2
Logan Jones, Center from Iowa is the pick, not a fan so early in the draft. Feels like a reach.
-
Round 2, Pick 57, Logan Jones, C
Understand the pick but felt that was a little early. Feels like they could've gotten him at the next 2nd rounder.
-
Best Available Day 2
McCoy has injury concerns, so Hill seems like the choice.
-
Best Available Day 2
Damn you Patriots, traded up and grabbed Jacas 2 picks before Bears.
-
Best Available Day 2
Edge - Young*, Howell*, Parker*, Jacas, Thomas DT - McDonald*, Miller, Hunter LB - Allen*, Rodriguez, Hill Jr CB - McCoy*, Terrell*, Hood*, Ponds, Cisse IOL - Bisontis, Pregnon A lot of impact guys still left on the board. The Bears should be able to get 1, if not 2 of the guys listed, and most are top 55 rated players. The guys with asterisks had 1st round or early 2nd round projections.