adam

Maybe Bright Orange and Navy Blue with 55 on the back?

I believe your first 10 look about right. If that is the case, Mendenhall or Clady may be in our future.

lol, that is hilarious. Also, I love how they can defend every pick by giving 5-6 options for every pick. Experts, lmao.

"With the 4th overall pick in the 2008 NFL Draft, the Oakland Raiders select Darren McFadden, RB, Arkansas" 5th pick poll here: http://www.talkbears.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=2270

1. Jake Long to Miami 2. Chris Long to St. Louis 3. Glenn Dorsey to Atlanta 4. Darren McFadden to Oakland 5. ????????????????? to Kansas City

I would love Chad Rinehart in the 4th or 5th.

Clady and Albert are the only 2 I would take over Mendenhall. I would have to think really hard about Williams or Otah over him.

So who did you vote for?

It is still between Gholston and McFadden. I can't see giving up anything of value for Jordan or Rhodes. I would rather get younger.

I wouldn't mind those picks. Rubin is the only odd one for me. I like the Rinehart pick and would even look to get his teammate Keith instead of Rubin. That would add some nice chemistry to the line with Clady, Kruetz, and Tait.

I think Balta said we would do community pick once it goes to long. It would be cool to finish the 1st two rounds before the draft.

Ok, 2 more votes for McFadden or 6 overall and we can move to pick#5.

The countdown timer shows that it will start at 4pm Central? So when is Miami on the clock?

3 more for McFadden or 7 overall votes and we can move on.

How about Urlacher to Cincy, CJ to Arizona, and Boldin and a draft pick to us?

Can those teams afford to draft a QB with other glaring needs? I just feel based on history someone would be there at 44 (Henne, Flacco, Brohm). Someone always falls.

I don't like moving up to get someone. First I would see what falls to us at 14. If all the OL come off the board early and there is nothing left, then I would move down and consider taking a QB in the mid to late 20's.

8 more votes.

No way Henne at 14. Like you said, I could see us trading down in the 1st, picking up an extra 2nd, and maybe take a QB late in the 1st. I just don't see all these QBs going by pick 44 though. If that happens, then the Bears will get a really solid pick other than QB available to them at 44.

Wouldn't you say that to maintain leverage? Once you say you are willing to trade, the power shifts to the player/agent and other teams.

Done deal. Change the Mocks, KC is getting #17 and will more than likely go DE with pick #5. That helps us. http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpag...224&id=2837

Would you be willing to give up to get him? or would you just pass on him because he will pull the same crap in 2-3 years?

9 more votes to move on to pick #5.

So I'm stupid for including the next 10 best available players in the poll?

Did anyone alert DB that he is on the clock? He posted in the main forum last night.