Caleb progressions

[jason]

Not all stats tell the story intended, but this is interesting nonetheless.

[DABEARSDABOMB]

I don’t think I even know how to understand this. Nor do I think it would be easy for whoever is calculating it to come up with it. Concept is good. 

[BearFan PHX]

There should be two versions of this chart - one when blitzed, or OL allows free runners, and the other when facing coverage.
Teams have been blitzing Caleb a lot, more than most QBs, so we need to punish them for that with hot reads, screens, draws, jet sweeps etc.

[AZ54]

I have no clue how to interpret this.  First receiver is a good thing ala Matthew Stanford or being a Checkdown king is a good thing ala Kirk Cousins.  Then you add in the myriad of variables like does your WR 1 suck or is he double covered forcing you to go elsewhere?   Is your OC any good or is he the idiot we had last year who often ran two or even three WR to the same area of the field?  Although that made it very easy to progress from 1 to 2 to 3    

[BearFan PHX]

17 minutes ago, AZ54 said:

I have no clue how to interpret this.  First receiver is a good thing ala Matthew Stanford or being a Checkdown king is a good thing ala Kirk Cousins.  Then you add in the myriad of variables like does your WR 1 suck or is he double covered forcing you to go elsewhere?   Is your OC any good or is he the idiot we had last year who often ran two or even three WR to the same area of the field?  Although that made it very easy to progress from 1 to 2 to 3    

agree - I think all you can take from this is whether a QB is a one read or run QB, after that its too chaotic to really mean much.

I suppose the extreme opposite too - if a QB is routinely throwing ti evenly to 1st 2nd and 3rd reads that might mean something too about reading the field. But if that QB is under pressure, it might just be the scramble drill and not even distribution by design?