adam Posted 13 hours ago Report Share Posted 13 hours ago The Bears have the 25th pick in the 2026 draft. Pass Rush is an issue, no starting Safeties, and a question mark at LT. They need at least 2 starters from this class. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASHKUM BEAR Posted 13 hours ago Report Share Posted 13 hours ago DE and DT come to mind for 1 and 2 and a S round 3. I dont see Billings back, think Dexter can handle nose? The need at LT stinks bc we have resources. This is Kirans time to rise, of Ozzy can do it he can too. We need Ozzy back ASAP, but feel it could be into next season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted 13 hours ago Report Share Posted 13 hours ago 8 minutes ago, ASHKUM BEAR said: DE and DT come to mind for 1 and 2 and a S round 3. I dont see Billings back, think Dexter can handle nose? The need at LT stinks bc we have resources. This is Kirans time to rise, of Ozzy can do it he can too. We need Ozzy back ASAP, but feel it could be into next season. Billings so he can make tackles 8 yards off the LOS? No we don't need that. If there is a stud safety there in Rd 2 I'm ok taking him there but logic says go DT/DE early. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted 12 hours ago Report Share Posted 12 hours ago 39 minutes ago, ASHKUM BEAR said: DE and DT come to mind for 1 and 2 and a S round 3. I dont see Billings back, think Dexter can handle nose? The need at LT stinks bc we have resources. This is Kirans time to rise, of Ozzy can do it he can too. We need Ozzy back ASAP, but feel it could be into next season. You're spot on, the big key is LT options. I doubt they draft one in the first. Clearly Braxton gone, how long will Ozzy be gone and can Kiran compete with Theo until Ozzy is back? We have plenty of time to project. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted 12 hours ago Report Share Posted 12 hours ago With the way Brisker played after a healthy year played his best game as a pro in the most important game , I think they will strongly consider bringing both Ss back. It comes down to money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, Stinger226 said: With the way Brisker played after a healthy year played his best game as a pro in the most important game , I think they will strongly consider bringing both Ss back. It comes down to money. He wasn’t very good against the Packers. I wish he had played like he did today all year long. It’s time for younger players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASHKUM BEAR Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 10 minutes ago, AZ54 said: He wasn’t very good against the Packers. I wish he had played like he did today all year long. It’s time for younger players. For sure, I can see a one year extension but not long term. He played great tonight but wasn't any where near like this all year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 8 hours ago, AZ54 said: He wasn’t very good against the Packers. I wish he had played like he did today all year long. It’s time for younger players. He wasn't great in coverage, but was the top tackler. Our stud safety is already on the team. It's Tremaine "can't fill the hole" Edmunds. He finishes every play from the secondary. The wife even notices now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan Grizzly Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 12 hours ago, adam said: and a question mark at LT. So any reason Thuney couldn’t stay LT - if needed? I mean sure it was one game but he and McFadden did a pretty bang up job last night. Rarely did Caleb have to scramble and this was against one of the best defensive front out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearFan PHX Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 22 minutes ago, Alaskan Grizzly said: So any reason Thuney couldn’t stay LT - if needed? I mean sure it was one game but he and McFadden did a pretty bang up job last night. Rarely did Caleb have to scramble and this was against one of the best defensive front out there. possibly until Trapilo is ready anyway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASHKUM BEAR Posted 44 minutes ago Report Share Posted 44 minutes ago 27 minutes ago, BearFan PHX said: possibly until Trapilo is ready anyway? Get Kiran prepared for the job and Thuney as insurance. Kiran either steps up or steps out. Hate to see him bust. Wish his dad never ran into Flus at the golf course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted 41 minutes ago Author Report Share Posted 41 minutes ago For positional value, the Bears need an immediate starter at #25, that seems like DT or S, but could also be CB, LB, or Edge with a Wild Card being OT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASHKUM BEAR Posted 26 minutes ago Report Share Posted 26 minutes ago 10 minutes ago, adam said: For positional value, the Bears need an immediate starter at #25, that seems like DT or S, but could also be CB, LB, or Edge with a Wild Card being OT. Which position will make the most impact. A DE/DT can help the DBs. I doubt any hybrid ILB/edge rushers fall that far, but DA is a LB guy. That Reese from OSU is going to go top 10 if not higher. Id like to see a 3T, but that makes Dexter a player who needs to transition to NT and he may not be stout enough to plug that gap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABEARSDABOMB Posted 19 minutes ago Report Share Posted 19 minutes ago My guess is DT or LB end up going here. Could even see a slight move down and target one of those spots or a safety. But don’t force your hand - play best talent that falls. I doubt it will be a DE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted 1 minute ago Report Share Posted 1 minute ago 1 hour ago, Alaskan Grizzly said: So any reason Thuney couldn’t stay LT - if needed? I mean sure it was one game but he and McFadden did a pretty bang up job last night. Rarely did Caleb have to scramble and this was against one of the best defensive front out there. Thuney in a pinch, but you don't want to leave him there, due him being dominant at guard. Benedet can fill in next year as he gets stronger. BJ was on record wanting Thuney at LT this week because of the opponent matchup. Jared Verse's strength is a great bull rush and they wanted that neutralized. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.