DABEARSDABOMB Posted May 21, 2012 Report Share Posted May 21, 2012 http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/footb...0,2225624.story Bucs have told him he won't be with them. Bears have had interest in him in the past. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted May 21, 2012 Report Share Posted May 21, 2012 They have Spaeth, Rodriguez, and Davis. Pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted May 21, 2012 Report Share Posted May 21, 2012 I'm in agreement. I'm not sure of the $ he'd want... I suppose for a low $, I'd take a run at him. But I don't see him settling for low $. And I'm not really all that sure an injury prone over rated prima donna is worth it regardless. They have Spaeth, Rodriguez, and Davis. Pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted May 21, 2012 Report Share Posted May 21, 2012 You can never have too much depth, but the question is dollars and cents and of course, whether or not the Bears believe in Kellen Davis, which I believe they do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted May 21, 2012 Report Share Posted May 21, 2012 You can never have too much depth, but the question is dollars and cents and of course, whether or not the Bears believe in Kellen Davis, which I believe they do. He is making 3.3 mil, so what would he want for money. Last year he caught 75 passes for 765 and 2 TDs. I would say we could give that a shot.Spaeth is making 1.75, who would be worth more? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan Grizzly Posted May 21, 2012 Report Share Posted May 21, 2012 I'd have to say "no" mostly for the same reasons already mentioned. Especially given Davis, Spaeth and Rodriguez are already on the team. I think the team has as good a chance to get most or all of what they need out of these three. And rather than throw money away at a player like this, save it for using towards getting Forte signed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted May 21, 2012 Report Share Posted May 21, 2012 I'd have to say "no" mostly for the same reasons already mentioned. Especially given Davis, Spaeth and Rodriguez are already on the team. I think the team has as good a chance to get most or all of what they need out of these three. And rather than throw money away at a player like this, save it for using towards getting Forte signed. Not related to Window, but spaeth is useless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted May 21, 2012 Report Share Posted May 21, 2012 I don't understand why they would let him go. 75 catches last year? They have tons of money and are not stockpiled with weapons. Must be something else... Edit: they signed Dallas Clark. Clark has been useless the last two years. Id rather have Winslow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted May 22, 2012 Report Share Posted May 22, 2012 Can Winslow block? Serious question if anyone knows. If he's just another Greg Olsen I prefer to keep our Davis and Spaeth and let the new kid fill the downfield WR role. If Winslow is mostly just a pass catching threat then I pass at any price. If he can block decently then he might be worth a shot but with bad knees it's hard to invest too much into him when he can't practice. We'll have to offenses version of Tommie Harris....all "if". Oh and the reason for the blocking question is that I value Cutler's health and I don't trust our Oline to keep him that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LT2_3 Posted May 22, 2012 Report Share Posted May 22, 2012 Moot point: Traded to Seattle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted May 22, 2012 Report Share Posted May 22, 2012 I don't understand why they would let him go. 75 catches last year? They have tons of money and are not stockpiled with weapons. Must be something else... Edit: they signed Dallas Clark. Clark has been useless the last two years. Id rather have Winslow. Entirely an attitude thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted May 22, 2012 Report Share Posted May 22, 2012 As LT2 pointed out, moot point. However, Winslow is essentially the TE version of a certain WR that everyone rails against because of his attitude. Hell, Winslow even had a major leg injury! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted May 22, 2012 Report Share Posted May 22, 2012 Seattle was also able to absorb a $4.8 million cap hit while trading for Winslow, the Bears probably couldn't have done that if the most recent cap number is to be believed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.