CrackerDog

Yes.

Damn, I'm shocked nobody took the "I'll bet you wouldn't call them pussies to their face" side of things here! It looks like we're pretty unanimous as a group that the game is suffering because of the rule changes. I think football is reflecting the population of the US these days. We've all gotten a little soft.

They also failed to mention that many QB's are a lot bigger now too! Can you imagine little Jimmy McMahon playing against these animals? Jeez, one hit and he'd be out for the season every year. So, there's a bit of a balance there in that, anyway. To be fair, Palmer's comments in the article seemed pretty balanced as well. He just says it matter of factly and admits if he played the other positions he'd be pissed too. So, at least he knows he's getting unfair protection. Hey, listen, Brent Fart lasted a LONG time in this league with the guys being fast and big. They better quit tampering with the game before they ruin it.

I watched the first half on TIVO. Hood missed three tackles and had poor coverage on one reception. I assume they saw no reason to keep him since he didn't outplay the other guys. I wouldn't go so far as saying he "sucked" though since the team was hardly putting on a tackling clinic during the game. But I'm not surprised they cut him either, based on this performance. I assume they think they can find someone else along the way if necessary who can perform at least to this level.

So he asked five pussies thier opinion...

Obviously QB's are way too protected by the rules and, IMO, rules can't possibly protect the QB's. All the rules in the world wouldn't have saved Brady last season. When a lineman accidently hits a QB with his pinkie it shouldn't cost the D 15 yards. COME ON! And this whole "Landing on the QB with all your weight" deal, ridiculous. That's exactly what you should do to a QB when you get there! I'm not saying hit him late, play within the rules. But the rules shouldn't make it nearly impossible to get a sack without incurring a penalty. I don't believe "helmet to helmet" ought to be illegal. Maybe they should make better helmets but if two players collide and it's fairly obvious that the helmets touching was impossible to avoid in the circumstances, it shouldn't be a penalty. If someone is out there using their helmet as a weapon, it's clear and there should be a penalty. Too many borderline "horse collar" penalties are called. The back of your jersey ISN'T your facemask! Stop treating them the same way! The rule is supposed to allow for defenders to let the collar go part way through a tackle. Mark my words, the way things are going we're going to have arena league type rules about how many players you can have in the box and probowl style rules limiting blitzing if we aren't careful about how much we allow the league to change the rules. Yes, it sucks that players get injured in football. But everyone knows that when they get into it and it'll always be that way, no matter how many rules you change. I think the current game is already weak compared to the 80's when the Bears were great. Football is violent. Deal with it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma

Of course not. But they should be better at it than they are.

And don't look the the depth chart on ChicagoBears.com. It' still doesn't even mention Tillman and Jones is still our #2 at RB. They're HORRIBLE at updating this site and it's embarrassing for the charter franchise of the league to have this public face always be so out of date.

Of course you can't discuss this topic without bringing up the Ditka era. There was never a coach with the Bears who held this with more reverence. Some of the truly ugly events of the rivalry occurred during this time (Charles Martin, Mark Lee, Ken Stills) but some of the funniest also occurred. Using the Fridge in the backfield, embarrassing the Packers, and then using him again to catch a pass... It will live on forever. The hatred between Forrest Gregg and Mike Ditka was real. Lovie is the first coach we've had in a while who understands this rivalry and he's actually got a solid record against the Packers. Say what you want about Lovie's "fire" but he's been on the right side of this issue from day one.

Not saying I'm confident. Just waiting until I see the results play out on the field before I cry myself to sleep. Frankly, at this point, there ain't shit we can do about it.

If it happens it'll happen tomorrow morning. I assume JA is either: 1.) satisfied with our WR's or 2.) waiting to see who is cut before deciding on a veteran (like Jones) to add

I certainly wish him well.

Yep. But Hester proved to be the better pick even if he never develops further. That one season was so special I'll die with fond memories of it all.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/...or-illegal-hit/

I'll take the under on the Packers scoring 50 points. How much you willing to wager?

I agree with this. But they'll need to find someone. AP is a good #3 and Wolfe isn't ever going to be considered a starter in the NFL. So... Watch the wire.

Was he really that bad dude? I missed most of the game so I'm really just asking. He's been with the team for a few days so maybe it's just a learning thing. Although, if he was missing tackles that shouldn't happen.

I'd keep AP over Wolfe... But that's just me.

LOVE beating Green Bay to get there. Sure hope we do. But then let's just go ahead and win it.

http://www.chicagobears.com/news/NewsStory.asp?story_id=6073 Good quick read.

If you liked those, you'll LOVE this: http://deadspin.com/5347795/why-your-team-...-denver-broncos Now, mind you, there's a bit of salty language in the linked article. Proceed with caution.

So if you're out there, Favre gets a pass and you don't even flag him. The refs were wrong to flag him because Favre also got hit and according to what you saw on the play, it was above the knee? I'm just trying to understand your point completely. So, it's actually the guy's fault, not Favre? How dare he run a tad slowly for your liking? I guess there ought to be a section in the rulebook specially designed for Favre that says, essentially, he can do whatever he likes, even if it injures someone else? He is, after all, godlike. Hence why there are rules and why Favre was flagged for his illegal block.

I don't understand why he'd announce he had a cracked rib in the first place. That's dumb. Either it's bullshit or his ego is so huge he had to get it out there that he was playing with pain. Couldn't stand not getting even more attention than he was already getting. When I watch the guy play I hope he gets killed with every snap. I can't stand how the announcers say his f'ing name every five seconds and they always call him "brettfavre" like it's one word. It's like nails on a chalkboard for me. So, I hope someone breaks his other 23 ribs and send him home to Mississippi on a stretcher for good.

And they lied to him, if you believe his side of the story. And now the owner is, according to what I heard, recanting the part about him not returning phone calls. So, they lied about that too. I can't blame the guy. He's the QB, not some third string safety. He's supposed to be the face of your franchise and the leader on offense. He's proven his abilities. To have them subvert him rather than support him and then try to backpedal after things went south with Cassel... They didn't earn the right to the benefit of the doubt, IMO.