Mongo3451

Me too. I think he's the best player in the draft.

Must run in the family...

He is a complete boom or bust. I'll take Him in the 2nd in a heart beat. I don't care if he's a lot nutty, as long as he harnesses his inner Hampton or McMichael. Those dudes were nuts, but football players...

It would actually be brilliant. Draft the guy you wanted all along, while gaining a few quality picks.

Why not Tunsill at 3?

If he makes it to 11, RB is dead in the NFL. Or teams have lost their mind. There are 3 can't miss players in this draft with Tunsill and Ramsey being the other two. Just one man's opinion...

I don't go out on a limb much, but as a pure running back, he's better than Forte. The only category Forte has him in is receiving. It's all speculation, because 22 is tested, Elliott, not a snap. If Stanley is not there, Elliott is my next covered player. It's all crazy because we need a guy that get after the QB more than anything. I just don't think one is out there for our pick...

I don't go out on a limb much, but as a pure running back, he's better than Forte. The only category Forte has him in is receiving. It's all speculation, because 22 is tested, Elliott, not a snap. If Stanley is not there, Elliott is my next covered player. It's all crazy because we need a guy that get after the QB more than anything. I just don't think one is out there for our pick...

I would love Elliott. I think he will be a better pro back than college. Great base, size and strength combo. Superb pass blocker to go along with great running skills. I'm all in for the Langford who party?

Sad but true...

Problem is that we always say it will be a better time next year.

The quarterback of the future is imperative. Cutler is not guaranteed to play 4 more years. I don't like to plan QB based on OTHER needs. If your guy is there, take him! People say GB took Rodgers as a luxury. I say, how could you not? If you pass on that guy, you may be back to the Bears of the nineties to mid 2K. Solid QB is always a must.

The quarterback of the future is imperative. Cutler is not guaranteed to play 4 more years. I don't like to plan QB based on OTHER needs. If your guy is there, take him! People say GB took Rodgers as a luxury. I say, how could you not? If you pass on that guy, you may be back to the Bears of the nineties to mid 2K. Solid QB is always a must.

Amen! You and I have carried this message since the old board. Now is the time! Find a way to draft Stanley and put this to rest for the next decade. It may not be our biggest need, but at least it would complete one unit on the team. The foundation! Once you have a foundation, you can build. It's simply a philosophy that takes a little more time, but built to last...

My bad. I thought they had to be under contract other than franchise.

All of the above. The only problem is that we would have to sign and trade. No team is going to give 2 firsts for him.

If we were a veteran team, I would prefer keeping him. But while you are trying to establish a culture, it's best he's gone.

Lock up Long and Jeffery.

Lock up Long and Jeffery.

Round one is still perfect!

Both of those guys are monsters

I would love to land one of the LT's, Elliott or a pass rusher.

Scroll up to see what Stinger posted. Looks like he was quoted out of context.

The jackass is also on record saying he wished the Packers would have signed him. He's gonna have to make up for that one.

I love this signing. Long will be back at G where he belongs. Now give me Ronnie Stanley...