Mongo3451

This is what I want as well. I don't think there is a corner worthy of 7, so I wouldn't go there. That OT from Iowa is 6 on Mel's big board. I wouldn't mind that either.

Guarantee he's bigger too. Garza is lucky if he's actually 285...

Lol

So, if Gurley or Gordon is there in the 2nd round, you don't pick them? Forte would be gone before the draft was over.

I'll take the Colts

From my perspective, you must have ability to stretch the field to be able to effectively run the ball. We don't have the speed at any position to get any team out their game plan.

With the lack of talent all over the team, I don't think BPA was never not an option.

Now I hope we draft an OLB, so you can finish falling off the deep end, lol...

I think the vet min signings are no cost on cap.

Michael Bush ran a 4.91...

You are not wrong. If Collins goes to us at 7, I would be shocked.

Damn, you are a perpetually negative f'er aren't you? Lol...

Wow, that's a lot of draft choices added in the last 4 years.(21 picks) Add that to the studs they already had on the roster and they should have been a juggernaut. I'm really interested to see what SF looks like after losing a bunch of talent, because it looks like they should have replacements in the pipeline. Also interested to see how many of them stuck and are with other teams.

It depends on whether they think Winston is a fit. On the BPA front, nobody said draft a QB every pick if they are BPA etc. The premise is to not let needs dictate your draft. Proactive vs reactive is all it is.

There absolutely nothing more effective for a defense than to keep them off the field...:-)

That's an intersting take. I know from my own standpoint, we never talked about concussions in sports. We just called it getting your bell rung. I remember the trainer popping amonia packets to revive guys and having a ringing in my ears after a good hit. I'm approaching 50 now and sometimes feel as if I'm a little more foggy than I should be. Other times, sharp as always. The more I read and learn, the less I like. The study that bothered me most was the one published in the last year. They performed baseline studies on HS football players before they started the season and all of the kids brain functions lowered as the season progressed. That being said, the brain recovers and the kids functions returned to baseline shortly after the season ended. Scary stuff though, as I have a nine year old that really loves to play.

Remember when people bitched their ass off because we drafted CB last year? Now you want another one. String him up! Lol, if he's a good one, I'm for it!

Nobody does that. When BPA is discussed, it's based on a teams draft board. If there's no requirement, they won't be on the board...

Fun stuff. I see WR, TE, CB, S, OL, DT and RB. (no specific order) If you look at Ratliff, Tillman and Allen, they will need replacements ready at a moments notice. Probably a year late on Allen. That's why I loved the Fuller pick when it happened(Tillman) See Forte as well.

From a leadership perspective it's gone from WTF it's happening to I can't believe this is happening.(in a good way)

Yep. If production were the only criteria in determining value, Marshall would have been worth a whole lot more. The rest of the league knew this. I hope it's addition by subtraction.

If they think they have a stud at 7, I would stay. Otherwise, more picks the better.

If trade Forte, I love it.

I would like to see one drafted as well. Aside from Mcphee, every potential LB we have is either old, miscast or inexperienced. Plus there is a lot of talent at this position in the draft. Knowing that this is the havoc position in a 3-4 doesn't hurt either.

It feels good to be right once in awhile...