jason
-
Posts
8,650 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Posts posted by jason
-
-
20 hours ago, killakrzydav said:
Hate it. OL needs to be #1 focus.
-
I don’t get to watch many games lately. But I got to see Red zone highlights.
What struck me was that every single time Fields drops back he is being chased. Every snap someone is busting through relatively cleanly. One play it’s from the left. Next play it’s up the gut. Then the right. Then the channel flips to KC, and Mahomes has time to tie his shoes on every other play.
Until the QB gets time CONSISTENTLY, he can never be properly evaluated, and can never truly progress.
Keep Fields.
Trade the #1.
Draft OL. -
21 minutes ago, BearFan PHX said:
Gary Crowton, John Shoop, Msrk Trestman, Matt Nagy, Luke Getsy - hey bubble screens all the time!
Thanks giving me PTSD.
To be fair though, at least Crowton was creative.
-
Semi-serious question.
Does Jaylon Johnson have thumbs?His hands are atrocious.
He will never be top tier if he can’t catch garden variety interceptions that should be game-changing pick 6 plays.
-
1 minute ago, BearFan PHX said:
how do you know? LOL
He didnt play in the same system as Mitch, has twice as many games and is a different kind of QB.
Now I havent watched Maybe enough to endorse him. So if you have some substantive criticisms, Im all ears, and wont even disagree with you. Ill take those and think of them when I start watching film on these guys.
But just that he went to NC? Didn't Michael Jordan go there too? LOL that's doesnt mean anything either of course.- Yes, he goes to UNC where Trubisky went.
- He plays against weak ACC competition.
- He looks almost exactly like Grayson Allen.
- He has too many WTF games
- Throws off his back foot a lot
- Wild ad-libbing footwork
Mostly though, you're right, it's #1-2 for me. I'm not a fan of drafting dudes from non-powerhouse schools when they rack up stats against subpar competition.
-
The best strategy to the original post is obviously strategy #1.
- Trade out of 1 or both of the 1st round picks for a king's ransom.
- Build the roster
- Heavy focus on offense
- Cut the fat
- Take the reigns off Fields in 2024
- Bring in an OC who understands how to create a successful passing offense
-
-
Ooooof. Sore subject. Many of us loved Kupp and wanted the Bears to draft him. Instead, the Bears mortgaged the future on a completely ignorant Trubisky trade. For the life of me I'll never understand how anyone thought trading up for Trubisky made any sense. A dude with one year's worth of good stats against ACC competition over a proven winner with two years of absolute domination over not just the ACC but also the college playoffs.
Without the trade the Bears could have had:
- Deshaun Watson
- Cooper Kupp
- And a fourth round pick without trading into the fourth multiple times
-
The experiment is over.
There is no QB controversy.
Fields is QB1.
-
On 10/31/2023 at 11:37 PM, AZ54 said:
All the RAS talk is great, but never forget when the Bears drafted that pool-jumping dickhead, and he amounted to nothing.
Rather than RAS players, I want players with high RFS (Relative Football Score). Someone who fills up the stat sheet and dominates, particularly against great competition. It's precisely why I hated the Trubisky pick when Deshaun Watson was available. Trubisky did less than Watson, against worse competition, and for one year only. That's a no brainer, pick Watson. Or, since another thread is talking Center, a perfect example is Tyler Linderbaum. Three straight years as a starting Center at Iowa, a historical offensive line factory. Obvious upside and minimal downside.
-
4 hours ago, Mongo3451 said:
I want to draft the best center prospect possible. Poles needs to search for football IQ and leadership as well as the obvious physical traits. We don't know, the center we draft could be playing tackle right now. This position was the only thing that left me wanting in the off season. Poles missed on not getting one.
I want Poles to draft an OC that has played a lot of OC. Multiple years. This perpetual Chicago offensive line interchangeable parts thing has virtually never succeeded. I'm sick of it. The Bears should draft someone for every position that has a ton of reps at that position.
-
Please no. The price tag is too high. Let's not repeat the Mack mistake. A team needs draft capital, not a really good player on a team with several other holes.
-
On 9/12/2023 at 7:48 PM, adam said:
All I can say is wow. This is exactly how the game looked in real time, but every play had so much more badness than I thought. A must watch, but it is an hour long. Much better than rewatching the game. JT has some funny zingers. Arguably his best video yet.
Great video. This dude is breaking down things we've been talking about on this board for a decade.
-
8 hours ago, BearFan PHX said:
PFF, at best, is completely random. Time and time again they pronounce things are true that anyone watching the game can see are not even close to being true.
I want to see us succeed this year. I have hope that we can turn things around, but whether we are great or terrible, PFF is random.Preach. I'm so sick of hearing about PFF. Their stats are trash, and often don't match the actual game that you see with your own eyes. PFF is the type of organization that suits the phrase, "Don't piss on me and tell me it's raining."
-
On 7/25/2023 at 2:22 PM, AZ54 said:
I know this is just guys walking in from the parking lot but Alex Leatherwood looks soft as if he spent the offseason like I did sitting on the sofa. In contrast Borom looks lean this year.
Agree. And Sanborn looks like a guy who was born to tackle and eat glue. I love that dude. If he improves off of last year, the 2023 LB corp are going to shock the world.
-
Did I see he signed?!?!?!!?
-
We all see the Power Rankings year after year and think the media hates the Bears. I honestly think there is a bias because of the rug-burned knees while covering Farv and Erin for the past 20+ years. While the Power Rankings this year don't seem to tell a different tale, the point spreads do.
Bears 2023 Schedule ATS
Week 1: Packers at Bears -2.5 Week 2: Bears -1 at Buccaneers Week 3: Bears at Chiefs -9.5 Week 4: Broncos -1 at Bears Week 5: Bears at Commanders -1 Week 6: Vikings at Bears (Pick em) Week 7: Raiders at Bears -1.5 Week 8: Bears at Chargers -4.5 Week 9: Bears at Saints -3 Week 10: Panthers at Bears -2.5 Week 11: Bears at Lions -4.5 Week 12: Bears at Vikings -3 Week 13: bye week Week 14: Lions -1 at Bears Week 15: Bears at Browns -3 Week 16: Cardinals at Bears -5 Week 17: Falcons at Bears -2.5 Week 18: Bears at Packers NL There are four games with a larger point spread than a field goal. FOUR. And one of those games the Bears are favored!!
Vegas is right more often than the pundits are; otherwise, there wouldn't be multi-billion dollar operations in the Vegas desert. And the point spreads say this is an extremely unknown year for the Bears. According to the spread, the Bears could conceivably go 14-3. Of course, the inverse is true as well. One additional tidbit I found interesting is that the 2023 media darlings, the Detroit Lions, the team that's supposed to shock the world and win the North, is only favored by 4.5 at home and 1 in Chicago. If they're so good, the point spreads would say as much.
All that said, there is a good chance the point spreads hold relatively true. Chalk is 7 wins counting the Vikings pick'em and Packers NL. Flip the Broncos, Commanders, and Lions games with a +1 point spread for the Bears, and we're suddenly at 10 wins. I don't see that as implausible. In fact, I think flipping a few more is conceivable, especially considering how unlucky the teams was on close games last year.
Final verdict: Bears go 10-7 and shock the world.
-
On 7/7/2023 at 12:49 PM, adam said:
I was looking at some stats to see if there were other cases of QBs with similar stats to Fields after their second years, and surprisingly, there were actually quite a few and some that ended up very successful.
Here is a screenshot of the output.
16 QBs qualified, since 1980, in their first two seasons, totaled less than 30 TDs, more than 20 INTs, Comp % under 60, and yards less than 5000.
That is a scary list. Aside from a few hits, it's loaded with busts and guys who never reached their potential.
-
Here's your chance to say what you would have done now that you have 20/20 hindsight. The rules are
- No removing the trades
- No extra trades
- Players can only be selected if they went at or after the Bears picks
-
Would have liked to see DE and C before WR. This tells me they are moving Whitehair to C.
-
1 minute ago, ASHKUM BEAR said:
I'd love to see them get the DE from Louisville Yaya Diaby to put a seal on the D and then get a Center like Wypler or Stromberg.
1000% agree. If he gets a DE and a C this draft is an undeniable master class.
-
I LOOOOOVE POLES.
This dude gets it. OL, DL, CB, DL. He’s killing it.
-
And now the Lions reach big for a LB that definitely would have been there in the second round. LOL
-
15 minutes ago, Alaskan Grizzly said:
Because I'm curious, why not Skronski? He ended up being the next picked.
I wonder also. I’m more a fan of the huge monster OTs with long arms and fast feet, but I think Ski will also end up being very good.
My draft addiction (Keep JF1 edition)
in Bearstalk
Posted
Don’t like the lack of OL prioritization, but MHJ and Bowers would be an impressive commitment to offense.