DABEARSDABOMB

I thought Brees and Carmichael worked together at San Diego as well. Regarding Arians, he clearly did a good job and changed the perception. I guess entering this year he was looked at as a career assistant and that his personality didn't fit a head coach. He clearly knows offenses though. Regarding McCoy, he's worked under Fox (who is a really good coach) and really has understood quite a bit. He made Delhomme look good and did a lot with Orton. Very personable, willing to change and adapt, has been quoted about how it is important to understand what your players do well and to adjust to that. Seems like a good fit but I definitely can see your arguments. I really wonder though if Thomas was more talking about the fact that in the offense with Tebow he couldn't really figure out what the hell was going on so there weren't really routes.

Normally if you hire an offensive head coach, he's going to hire a guy he is comfortable and let that guy run the system. They might have a preference to one system or another but in many instances they may have worked with teams that have ran both types of defenses and thus have contacts that have ran both. I'd have a hard time seeing an offensive coach completely change the teams defensive structure given how the defense has performed. That said, they very well might not want to keep Marinelli around and it is their right to bring in their guys but if the Bears hire an offensive coach I'd put the odds as pretty good that they would be comfortable running a similar system to what Lovie did.

Guys that if you were the GM, you'd have to interview (and would be disappointed if Emery didn't). For me it is as follows: Mike Holmgren (my top choice) Andy Reid Bill O'Brien Mike McCoy Shanny Gruden Note: I'd have to at least put in a couple calls to Cowher's agent as well to see if there was any interest.

That stat probably has more to do with the fact that A) It is really really hard to win a superbowl and not too many superbowl coaches go on to coach many other places so the odds are extremely against it. I do know Holmgren has made the superbowl with 2 different teams.

Why is everyone ready to move away from the 4-3 cover 2 defense. I don't get it. This defense is good. If we are hiring an offensive coach and have the right personell for the 4-3 and run it well (and for all I know Marinelli will stick around and he's proven to be a very very good DC), then what is the hurry in switching to the 3-4. There are plenty of 3-4 defenses that totally suck. This defense is good...I see why we want to fix the offense but see no reason to fix the D (other then continuing to try and find new talent so that the D can get younger).

I'd be curious. Brees is so exceptional at reading the defense and making quick decisions (great job at the intermediate reads). I'd be curious how Cutler would do in such an offense. I guess the key is having a strong enough personality (and proven enough guy) who can drill it into Cutler. That is why I'd love Holmgren. I'm a huge believer in the west coast offense and Holmgren has made a lot of QB's better (including the gunslinger Favre) and there is zero way Cutler could ignore the coaching from a guy like Holmgren. It is no surprise that Cutler has been at his best when he's worked with well proven guys (Shanny and to a lesser extent Martz). Never thought I'd say it, but fundamentally Cutler made strides under Martz that he hasn't made under the other Bears coordinators (Turner/Tice). No denying Carmichael's success with Brees (in San Diego and New Orleans) and he did a great job calling plays for the Saints this year. The thing i love is how the Saints use the running backs in the passing game (which goes into something Tice just totally screwed up (e.g., the total misuse of Forte, who imo, is the best receiving back in the league).

I don't see how you can cast a wide net and not interview 3 of the top candidates out their. I also think the Bears have to be very careful not to interview the whole world as there are a ton of teams looking at coaches and next thing you know we could be reacting and hiring the 4th or 5th or even worse 7th or 8th best guy. I saw where Peyton Manning gave McCoy major props.

Keller has produced and Rodriguez hasn't (and I'm not writing Rodriguez off here but he was just a 4th rounder). Unless your point is that they Keller isn't a good blocker, which is the case. Supposedly he made strides the past year or two, but no one would call his blocking good. He's very similar to Greg Olsen.

I like him. I think there are quite a few good TE candidates that are out there whom the Bears could sign that would be significant upgrades. We don't need an elite TE, just a good one would be great. Keller, Bennett, Finley, etc.

I'm officially on board with Holmgren being my top candidate. Followed by Reid and Gruden. Holmgren has done so much and succeeded in so many areas. He'd be an excellent grab for the offense and he's a total QB guru. Probably would be fine sticking with the cover 2 D and Marinelli (which I personally think is a good thing). Also has a very good eye for talent and could be helpful to Emery. What a coup hiring Holmgren would be. I wonder if Emery will do it though. You hire Gruden, Reid or Holmgren and you are no longer going to be the "face" so to speak. Hire an assistant and provide him with that opportunity and you still really control the power. Just my 2 cents.

Kyle Shannahan really intrigues me. Did a great job with Schaub and done good things with RG III. Heck, even Rex was decent at times in Washington. Seems really bright and talented, not sure what his personality is like. I'd also think he has quite a few connections through his pops.

Clement's issue is his limited experience running an O combined with the fact that he's older for an assistant (59 IIRC) to be hired as a HC. I really would have loved (and have always been high on) getting him a year or two years ago as our OC (too bad we couldn't get him).

I must be having a major brain fart. Who is Anderson?

Want to say your posts today have been spot on.

What a coup for the Cardinals. Best realistic candidate off the board. Huge bummer the Bears didn't even interview him.

What I meant was, he didn't get hired in the NFL as a head coach because of his college resume, it was because of his NFL experience (where he was for about 10 years before being hired as HC of the Pats).

Their will be changes to the oline. No doubt about that. But you can't replace 5 guys. My guess is we will see 2 new starters on the oline. You also have to hope that Carimi can get his shit together.

No other way to say it other then Gabe was awful. Worse tackle in football. Only thing you can hope as a fan is that this was due to him not being at full strength. He was just manhandled at the tackle position.

Agree with you on all counts. And for someone to say Louis was mediocre is laughable. The guy was an above average guard prior to the injury.

I think Bennett is still under contract. I thought it was last year where they signed him to an extension.

Agree with you on that. He clearly is in charge and I'm happy about that. That press conference shuts me up.

Saban wasn't bad, he just ran back to college. He is an elite coach and I believe (purely a belief) that if he wanted to, he'd be very successful in the pro ranks.

When Pete Carrol failed the 1st time he wasn't coming from the college ranks. He was a pro assistant that failed as a HC, IIRC. It was after that failure that he went into the college ranks.

Jerry Angelo gets a lot of credit as well for that. Or at least everything I've heard and read about his tenure in Tampa indicates he was very instrumental in that development.

I have no issue with Marinelli sticking around and am very open to Clements. Good post.