Daventry

Is that supposed to bother me? You have been playing the victim so well, be careful of your image

Yawn, admin? You won’t bother me, you are only showing your true self

Keep writing, you make yourself clearer all the time

Again, compose and spell. I pay attention, pay attention to yourself.

Learn to spell and compose sentences. I would ask admin to note this progression

Sure you did, just happens to fit your agenda perfectly. Try again.

It is my last bastion in protection from foolishness. Certainly not directed at you.

I have to give you credit, that scenario at least makes sense. I don’t agree, but it is at least plausible. Please refrain from your other illogical techniques.

My point was, the genius called Stinger, defying logic and plowing on with constant idiocy, would dismiss that positive trait of CW and use his vast skills to reverse logic again and make a positive a negative.

Then I am watching and if it fails I am back to not buying merchandise or paying much attention for awhile

That’s because the narrative of rooting for the underdog who has been mistreated is automatically popular. That’s because those fans haven’t sat and watched Fields suck and lose for three years.

No, that doesn’t count. Unless your initials are JF, of course.

Funny you say that when you use the same argument to advocate for Fields. Your arguments are outright ridiculous.

You can never be accused of being a quitter, that’s for sure. However, beating a dead horse springs to mind….

I agree but would use caution with talking heads in the media. Who knows what they really think? It’s a tough situation for sure, tough choices, but I sure hope we get a winning team in the end.

I am not saying for you to trust me, I am saying I trust me. I don’t trust the opinions of the talking heads in the media, they all have agendas

I don’t think Cutler was all that good at all, but I don’t want to relive the trauma of his slouch acting schtick that resulted in very little playoff plus results. Daniels is an asterisk in football by any measure. But, as I have said already, I will make my own mind up regardless, I don’t need outside input to decide on the Fields question. I respect others opinions, everyone’s, but I have seen enough and am tired of losing.

30 or 40? I don’t think there is nearly that many. However, even if there were 300-400, I would not ignore my eyes and the statistics from the last three years and go sheep-like into the JF fan club. We may not have a chance to get the #1 quarterback again for years. I would much rather risk it all that way than rewinding the last three years and/or restarting another rebuild after failure.

Extra weight because they played in Chicago? Why? Neither could be considered successful.

That’s a great reason to do the opposite. I would respect the opinion of a stranger at the bar than that guy

Yawn. Listen to Aerosmith “Same Old Story Same Old Song and Dance”. Again and again

Haha, fair point.

Probably to get a sense of the players views and make a show of paying attention to the players views. I am sure they are interested in players views and opinions but will that be a dominant part of decision making? No way IMO. This whole subject seems another attempt to justify keeping Fields, kind of like the cherry picked stats game that is popular.

So you are implying the ownership were swayed by player sentiment? Lol, here is a more realistic explanation, cheap skate ownership don’t want to eat the contract money. Another more realistic explanation is that we have finished year two of a four year rebuild.