Daventry

That’s because the narrative of rooting for the underdog who has been mistreated is automatically popular. That’s because those fans haven’t sat and watched Fields suck and lose for three years.

No, that doesn’t count. Unless your initials are JF, of course.

Funny you say that when you use the same argument to advocate for Fields. Your arguments are outright ridiculous.

You can never be accused of being a quitter, that’s for sure. However, beating a dead horse springs to mind….

I agree but would use caution with talking heads in the media. Who knows what they really think? It’s a tough situation for sure, tough choices, but I sure hope we get a winning team in the end.

I am not saying for you to trust me, I am saying I trust me. I don’t trust the opinions of the talking heads in the media, they all have agendas

I don’t think Cutler was all that good at all, but I don’t want to relive the trauma of his slouch acting schtick that resulted in very little playoff plus results. Daniels is an asterisk in football by any measure. But, as I have said already, I will make my own mind up regardless, I don’t need outside input to decide on the Fields question. I respect others opinions, everyone’s, but I have seen enough and am tired of losing.

30 or 40? I don’t think there is nearly that many. However, even if there were 300-400, I would not ignore my eyes and the statistics from the last three years and go sheep-like into the JF fan club. We may not have a chance to get the #1 quarterback again for years. I would much rather risk it all that way than rewinding the last three years and/or restarting another rebuild after failure.

Extra weight because they played in Chicago? Why? Neither could be considered successful.

That’s a great reason to do the opposite. I would respect the opinion of a stranger at the bar than that guy

Yawn. Listen to Aerosmith “Same Old Story Same Old Song and Dance”. Again and again

Haha, fair point.

Probably to get a sense of the players views and make a show of paying attention to the players views. I am sure they are interested in players views and opinions but will that be a dominant part of decision making? No way IMO. This whole subject seems another attempt to justify keeping Fields, kind of like the cherry picked stats game that is popular.

So you are implying the ownership were swayed by player sentiment? Lol, here is a more realistic explanation, cheap skate ownership don’t want to eat the contract money. Another more realistic explanation is that we have finished year two of a four year rebuild.

I think there is a good chance that the players saying Justin should stay are saying what they think they should say. Who knows what they really think? And does anyone really think Poles is not going to do what he thinks is best for the team to avoid upsetting the players? Much ado about nothing.

This is going to be an extremely interesting offseason.

Smart people review Fields stats for the last three years and conclude the obvious.

Exactly. One can manipulate statistics and manufacture excuses to hide reality.

Would Bagent be worth giving a shot at starting quarterback? It would be great to see a bit more of him

You can keep saying it as many times as you like, but that is bullsh£t. The culture will be re-set next year. I don’t expect the players to quit, but I will continue to hope they lose pointless games that only results in sliding down the draft board.

Have to go to Germany for that. I settle for the bottles. This game is having no effect except draft position. Which player will remember the “Winning culture” next year? Please

Sure, let’s give up draft position. Sponsored by wonderful German Weissbier

As you wish. This post courtesy of Paulaner Munchen Weissbier

It’s obvious baiting.