Jump to content

Week 8 Official Game Thread - CHI @ BAL, Oct 26th, 12PM CDT, CBS, CHI +6.5


adam

Recommended Posts

Looks like the Bears will come in at 6.5 underdogs to the 1-5 Ravens.  The LBs and Gordon are going to have to spy Jackson and stop Henry. 

This will be a tough one, but Baltimore's defense has been bad and that won't change much out of their bye.

If the refs call this game fair (unlikely), I could see the Bears winning this in a close game. However, the refs have shown they don't call games fairly, so I am thinking this will be close loss, both teams in the mid-20s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • adam featured and pinned this topic
30 minutes ago, adam said:

Looks like the Bears will come in at 6.5 underdogs to the 1-5 Ravens.  The LBs and Gordon are going to have to spy Jackson and stop Henry. 

This will be a tough one, but Baltimore's defense has been bad and that won't change much out of their bye.

If the refs call this game fair (unlikely), I could see the Bears winning this in a close game. However, the refs have shown they don't call games fairly, so I am thinking this will be close loss, both teams in the mid-20s.

I think we have the speed at LB to (mostly) contain Jackson.

We win or lose these games coming up purely on our own. It all depends on how consistent we can be that week. We are in all these games, even to win convincingly, but we can flame out too if we dont play with more discipline. Luckily, that seems to be coming in big supply each week from the coaches. This week were were good on the ground and on defense, and controlled the game the whole way. Next week, lets hope its Calebs turn. In time, all phases will show up together on a regular basis, and thats the contender we are looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been looking at the roughing the passer rules, because I truly don't understand how that penalty was called on Brisker.  He hit the  QB's arm while the ball was being thrown and the follow through brushed the QB's head.  Isn't there a provision in there where you are making a play on the ball?  Kinda like blocking a punt and blowing up the punter in the process...

Jason, can you elaborate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mongo3451 said:

I've been looking at the roughing the passer rules, because I truly don't understand how that penalty was called on Brisker.  He hit the  QB's arm while the ball was being thrown and the follow through brushed the QB's head.  Isn't there a provision in there where you are making a play on the ball?  Kinda like blocking a punt and blowing up the punter in the process...

Jason, can you elaborate?

I think any time you hit the QB in the head they will call it, even though I thought that one was weak. Check out the play where Caleb avoids the sack and gets the pass to Swift. The DT takes an extra step after the ball came out to then land all his body weight on the QB. That is always a penalty. No call.

Loveland's OPI call (now in back to back weeks). Saints RT false start on first TD, would've basically forced a FG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OPI penalty today on Loveland was crazy. He was standing there in ready to catch position for quite a while before the defender ran into him. In basketball that would be a charge on the defensive back. Crazy.

Im not a conspiracy theorist, so Ill just say i hope the bad calls get evened out over time with calls to our advantage. But i can see why some people might think it was on purpose, because they really are awful calls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be shocked if the Bears are within 2 touchdowns of BAL. Going to have to get better quarterback play to beat a team desperate for a win with their MVP quarterback coming back to play. This is a mega important game for Caleb to get back on track, because things have been trending in a negative direction for him for 3 weeks now.

This is supposed to be the soft part of the Bears schedule with all these bad defenses. If he can't put up numbers now, I think we're going to start having some harsher conversations about him in the not so distant future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...