Stinger226

Well if the Bears trade down and we would rather have a player they could have had at 20, doesnt that give us a different option? Or do we only pick with whatever the Bears picks are?

I think with Bennett, Forte, and another speed WR added, he will be throwing the ball around more. Marshall will be the main target, but it will change a lot this year.

I actually think it will be a 2nd, 3rd and 5th for our first round. I dont see 49ers giving away that much to move up 10 spots for a pick. I having been reading different positions and after Millner,Rhoades, I think Banks is the next best CB in the draft.

The most obvious would be who goes in the first round behind our pick. I also see a really good chance we trade back,so that will change our approach. That will still leave us with the option of who we would have taken in the first round.

With Edwin Williams on the team, I think he would be the first to replace Garza if he got hurt, but they must see something developmental in this guy. Maybe Kroner can turn him into a player in the NFL trenches. I did see where he had 30 reps on the benchpress, that would tell me the guy has some strength.

I agree we need help at several positions, but since we addressed some of those needs in FAgeny, I wouldn't objection if we drafted Austin in the first.. You don't think that help our offense?

YOU FIGURED ME OUT

#1 Warmack/OG #2 Brown/LB #4 Goodwin/WR #5 Fragel/Ot I HAVE TO ADMIT I GOT A BONER WITH THOSE FIRST TWO PICKS, THE THIRD ONE A MORNING TYPE HARD ON

If he doesnt play well this year, i dont think we will be offering the 15 mil a year deal. If he plays well it will be at least 15 mi.

I thought when he mentioned playmakers he was talking about the offense at the time, but Matthieu as a KR, PR would qualify for that also.

He has been around 5 years though, so not so much as far as developing type player like McC.

I dont think these signing affect our cap, its the cost of the top 51 roster spots, and I bet these are low value contracts.

I agree, I dont understand that signing, because we need a bigger guy to back up Paea.

Emery mentioned about adding playmakers to the team. I think Forte was not used properly last year and I think Trestman will do a better job of that. I think Bennett adds a lot to our offense. Jefferys gets better and you cant beat Marshall(he s a stud) Were not going to grab a RB in the draft, and I doubt very much if we draft a TE, so if we find a playmaker if will be at WR. I think the only 3 WRs that will turn into impact playmakers will be Austin, Patterson, and Woods. My first choice would be Austin, which could possibly be there for us in the first. Otherwise Woods could be there in the second, if we choose to go that way. SO WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK AS FAR AS CHASING A PLAYMAKER IN THE DRAFT

Why? doesnt bother me a bit. The only numbers I find imposing are 34 and 51. Otherwise I could care less.

OVERVIEW Early on at Florida State, Fluellen flashed the burst off the snap to someday earn a similar grade as recent Seminole first-round defensive tackles Travis Johnson and Broderick Bunkley. In starting 23 games as an underclassman, expectations were high entering his senior season. Unfortunately, he was robbed of his chance at a breakout campaign by a series of injuries. When healthy, Fluellen shows the quick first step to be a disruptor from the inside, but his lack of size and strength makes him more of a rotational player than a future starter. ANALYSIS STRENGTHS Positives: Short, thick frame with adequate muscle development. ... Could add some mass without a significant loss of quickness. ... Best asset is his initial and lateral quickness. ... Can penetrate gaps and close on the ballcarrier to make impressive tackles behind the line. ... Good effort in pursuit. ... Has the strength and savvy to slip blocks as backs run by him and make the tackle near the line. ... High effort player who is viewed as a team leader. Negatives: Never enjoyed the breakout campaign that was expected of him. ... Has struggled with consistency throughout his career. ... Marginal upper body strength is worsened by the fact that he often plays with poor pad level. ... Limited to the under-tackle (three technique) position as a 4-3 tackle due to his lack of size and strength. ... No major injuries throughout his career, but tends to be nicked up often.

OVERVIEW Moore might not have the most name recognition among the Southern Cal star-studded defense, but he led the Trojans with six sacks in 2008. Moore had flashed as a playmaker earlier in his career, including intercepting two passes as a junior before earning honorable mention All-Pac-10 recognition from league coaches in 2008, his first season as a full-time starter. While not explosive off the edge, Moore has strength and length at the point of attack. He's a solid second-day prospect capable of contributing as a base end. ANALYSIS STRENGTHS Positives: Rare height and wingspan for the position. ... Flashes initial quickness off the snap to pressure the outside shoulder of offensive tackles. ... Good overall playing strength. ... Can get into the tackle's body with his long arms and bull rush. ... Stout at the point of attack when he plays with leverage. ... Can get his hands up and create obstacles for the quarterback to see and pass through. ... Strong tackler and can pull down the ballcarrier with his arms. Negatives: Struggles with leverage and negates his own strength at times. ... Can get pushed back off the line of scrimmage when he plays too high. ... Needs to use his length more to disrupt passes. ... Doesn't bat enough passes down at the line of scrimmage. ... Marginal balance to redirect as a pass rusher or to break down in space to tackle. ... Flashes some speed to the outside, but too inconsistent. ... Had arthroscopic knee surgery prior to the 2008 season that requires a medical check at the Scouting Combine. Looked back at his profile in his draft year. He ran a 4.9 and 22 reps on the benchpress.

So he's entering his prime years, cool we got a sleeper.(just kidding) a camp body

I think were rolling the dice on some bodies and we will see how they shake out.

Im all cool with you,I have called you out on some things you have said, but I never meant it to be personal, as you have witnessed, I say stupid stuff sometimes(or a lot) . There are a lot of different posters that ride each other on this site, but that is what makes this interesting, the passion at which people have with their opinions. Sometimes I say things with out putting a lot of thought into and dont always do the research on every point I try to make, but having said all that I still make contributions on here. 6 of the 17 threads posted on here now are I ones that I started. If everybody drank the same koolaid, and agreed with each other, this would be a boring site. I am happy to say, this is not a boring site to visit.

Im all cool with you,I have called you out on some things you have said, but I never meant it to be personal, as you have witnessed, I say stupid stuff sometimes(or a lot) . There are a lot of different posters that ride each other on this site, but that is what makes this interesting, the passion at which people have with their opinions. Sometimes I say things with out putting a lot of thought into and dont always do the research on every point I try to make, but having said all that I still make contributions on here. 6 of the 17 threads posted on here now are I ones that I started. If everybody drank the same koolaid, and agreed with each other, this would be a boring site. I am happy to say, this is not a boring site to visit.

I called myself a dumb ass for taking the thread wrong, it doesnt bother me. As far as the "plumber boy comment" I dont have any problem with that either. If you have ever called a plumber you will realize they make good money doing shitty work. Although I usually do hospitals, schools, industrial work, I still get my face dirty once in a while.

I get all that, but the point I thought he was taking was (it is easy to do after the fact) When he referred to the next few weeks of compiling the lists, I thought he was talking about doing in now, as I last checked this is part of the off season. Hell lets go back a few years and redo the draft of the Bears and we all can look like heros. If were going to play GM, they dont usually wait until after the draft to put a draft board together. I thought we could play this realistically, but as I reread it you guys are probably right and Im the dump ass. It isnt the first and it wont be the last.

PEOPLE KEEP INJECTING OTHER POINTS INTO A SIMPLE POST; JUST PUT A LIST TOGETHER AND LETS DO IT,ENOUGH WITH THE UNNECESSARY POINTS.

You should completely wake up before you answer a thread, he is talking about doing this now,(as the Bears would do it) before the draft(.It's a way to pass some time over next few weeks and it will also build the official 2013 TalkBears draftee list.)