jason Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 I don't know how much Cap the Bears have left, but I assume it's enough to make a push for Peterson. The way I figure it, why not? He doesn't seem to be getting the interest expected, which means the cost will be lower than anticipated. He's a perfect "complimentary" back, which sounds ridiculous to say. Truth is, the Bears should be running way more than passing this year, so it makes sense to create a two-headed monster in Howard and Peterson. The added benefit is it obviously extends the usefulness of each RB because the lessened burden. And the cherry on top? Adrian Peterson would get to shove it to his former team who didn't want to keep him around. If I were Pace I'd kick the tires and see what he's asking for. I would sell him on the idea of proving the Vikings wrong TWICE a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 Peterson thought he'd be in demand and may have felt he could garner a starting job for at least $8 if not $10mil. When we see guys like Eddie Lacy pickup $5mil then clearly there has to be a big gap between that contract and what AP wants. I'm sure he also thinks of himself as a starter in the league. Having been a superstar for a decade I imagine it takes quite some time to come down from that plateau. There is still a lot of money available so I'm not sure he's lowered his expectations too much yet. Even if he does, I still want Howard to our star RB and I'm not sure there would be a good locker room fit if AP is pouting on the bench. Or telling the media he wants more playing time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted March 17, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 Peterson thought he'd be in demand and may have felt he could garner a starting job for at least $8 if not $10mil. When we see guys like Eddie Lacy pickup $5mil then clearly there has to be a big gap between that contract and what AP wants. I'm sure he also thinks of himself as a starter in the league. Having been a superstar for a decade I imagine it takes quite some time to come down from that plateau. There is still a lot of money available so I'm not sure he's lowered his expectations too much yet. Even if he does, I still want Howard to our star RB and I'm not sure there would be a good locker room fit if AP is pouting on the bench. Or telling the media he wants more playing time. Who's to say he'd do that? The Bears threw about 550 times last year, and only ran about 350 (minus QB scrambles). What if that ratio were more like 450/450? That would give both RBs over 200 carries. The Titans looked good last year with a split between Murray and Henry, and I wouldn't be shocked to see their ratio get closer this year considering how good Henry looked. I think the same type of attack could be created in Chicago's backfield with Peterson. I know I'd much rather see a 50/50 split than a ton of passing. This team is not good enough to get into firefights, and they need to try to shorten the game with running and good defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 No. He is old. His performance last year was awful. ...and the year before that, etc. And, by all accounts, he beats his children. No. F&*% no. I don't know how much Cap the Bears have left, but I assume it's enough to make a push for Peterson. The way I figure it, why not? He doesn't seem to be getting the interest expected, which means the cost will be lower than anticipated. He's a perfect "complimentary" back, which sounds ridiculous to say. Truth is, the Bears should be running way more than passing this year, so it makes sense to create a two-headed monster in Howard and Peterson. The added benefit is it obviously extends the usefulness of each RB because the lessened burden. And the cherry on top? Adrian Peterson would get to shove it to his former team who didn't want to keep him around. If I were Pace I'd kick the tires and see what he's asking for. I would sell him on the idea of proving the Vikings wrong TWICE a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASHKUM BEAR Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 No. He is old. His performance last year was awful. ...and the year before that, etc. And, by all accounts, he beats his children. No. F&*% no. I am a no also. We are young and do not need a guy at the end of his career at the RB position. Draft a late rounder if a stud is out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan Grizzly Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 I am a no also. We are young and do not need a guy at the end of his career at the RB position. Draft a late rounder if a stud is out there. Yeah, I'm a no too. And agree with drafting again if the 'powers that be' see it necessary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chitownhustla Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 No. He is old. His performance last year was awful. ...and the year before that, etc. And, by all accounts, he beats his children. No. F&*% no. 2015 He had a great year: http://www.nfl.com/player/adrianpeterson/2507164/careerstats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 My bad. Meant 2014. Still don't want him regardless. 2015 He had a great year: http://www.nfl.com/player/adrianpeterson/2507164/careerstats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 Pass. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'TD' Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 No. He is old. His performance last year was awful. ...and the year before that, etc. And, by all accounts, he beats his children. No. F&*% no. I have avoided him in fantasy football since then, just can't get behind a guy that did what we saw in those pictures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted March 18, 2017 Report Share Posted March 18, 2017 He has nothing to offer... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted March 18, 2017 Report Share Posted March 18, 2017 I don't know how much Cap the Bears have left, but I assume it's enough to make a push for Peterson. The way I figure it, why not? He doesn't seem to be getting the interest expected, which means the cost will be lower than anticipated. He's a perfect "complimentary" back, which sounds ridiculous to say. Truth is, the Bears should be running way more than passing this year, so it makes sense to create a two-headed monster in Howard and Peterson. The added benefit is it obviously extends the usefulness of each RB because the lessened burden. And the cherry on top? Adrian Peterson would get to shove it to his former team who didn't want to keep him around. If I were Pace I'd kick the tires and see what he's asking for. I would sell him on the idea of proving the Vikings wrong TWICE a year. Screw that, you want a name, bring in Jamal Charles and have him be our 3rd down back. That would keep him healthy and at prime level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradjock Posted March 18, 2017 Report Share Posted March 18, 2017 Based on Jeremy Langford and Jordan Howard, who were drafted in the 4th and 5th rounds, we need to keep drafting running backs. Everyone says, "Draft a QB every year." To hell with that. If you do it right, you only need one QB. Keep drafting running backs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted March 18, 2017 Report Share Posted March 18, 2017 I would say no to AP or any other veteran RB at this point. AP is over the hill and I don't know how his presence would impact the locker room as this team tries to form an identity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASHKUM BEAR Posted March 18, 2017 Report Share Posted March 18, 2017 Screw that, you want a name, bring in Jamal Charles and have him be our 3rd down back. That would keep him healthy and at prime level. I have had him on fantasy the past 3-4 year. Nooo, he is only healthy and productive when I do not have him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemonej Posted March 18, 2017 Report Share Posted March 18, 2017 AP and Howard are similar backs both lacking in pass receiving so I say no because if you want a similar back draft Fournette.If you want a true young one two punch, Tennessee's Kamara or Clemson's Galman are 3rd day options. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killakrzydav Posted March 19, 2017 Report Share Posted March 19, 2017 No. Ap. Still thinks he's a starter and I don't want to stunt Howard's growth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.