Stinger226

Everyone has bias. Members on this site always favor the redderick about the Bears. People I may have liked in the draft, I have a tendency to root for, people I didnt like , I tend to look for negative reviews. 5 people can look at a rep and have different opinions about it. You cant argue sacks and penalites but can assign blame to a QB or OL, or bad play call. Nobody likes PFF very much but they just look at every rep, and assign a grade. The bias is in how they grade a rep. On the rep the defender took the inside lane on Braxton, he blew it but the timing of the play got us a TD. You can scheme a bad OL play where it doesnt affect the outcome. So in my outlook, it didnt matter he blew it. On a personal grade for Braxton, worse play of the day for him. IMO, the only person on here that is somewhat lacking bias is Adam, he is critical and praise a player sometimes in the same post.

I dont think (didnt care ) comes into play. Fatigue is the most logical choice. He is fighting to keep his starting job. He wouldnt be on the field if the team thought he didnt care.

I havent watched or paid attention to his snaps (Jones) but Mongo did and he said most of his snaps were good , he had two bad plays. I trust his opinion and once I get a chance to watch his plays, I may have a different opinion. Also Ozzy was similar in his review.

Good observations but we should keep in mind, Braxton was going against starters for the first 3 sets and Ozzy played against 2s and 3s. If neither improve, likely they go with Braxton because of his 3 yrs of starting in the NFL. Did you notice if Ozzy was to upright or was he getting down in his set up?

I think until we see the starting OL playing together, we wont get the real picture on the LT spot. If no one shines there, they can give him chip help, scheme to control the damage. I think Thuney playing will help support the position also. If no one steps up, they will play Braxton because of his experience over a rookie. Braxton was playing against the #1 D starters where Ozzy played against the 2s and 3s. It matters where the OL is at in the first real game not the first preseason game, there is still time for someone to step up.

I think having an experienced QB in the room has to help Caleb, as far as keeping on the 53 that is another conversation.

With most of the starters sitting, I didnt expect a lot to cheer for but Monongai, Booker, Wheeler had some good moments. Jones didnt look good but at least he was playing against starters instead of 2nd string. Ozzy needs to improve. The DL did keep the pressure on but we need some better tackling.

They said before the game that all 3 were going to get snaps at LT. He is basically competing to be the swing T. He actually looks pretty good.

Santos was 8 of 9 over 50 yards last year and was getting a lot of crap for not having a strong leg. I can live with a 57 yarder.

Just came in on the last series

Ozzy is in the game, so far looks good

The returns suck so far

We can forget the names Flowers and Cook, giving up catches.

So far the middle seems to be holding up but the edge is allowing pressure

Kyle can carry a load if needed, frontline starters would make him look better.

A Tyler Scott sighting

Lots of players we can watch, looking for standouts, so far Sewell making plays. Preseason matters for depth, the rest is inmaterial.

It seems like other teams have more injuries than we do but JJ, Gordon and Shemar Turner will have an impact if not back.

This kid just kicked a 70 yard field goal https://youtube.com/shorts/3l4l4MKtroA?si=jvShppIk9c6Js5Xw

Does anyone else find joy in watching the Packers lose? Its a preseason game and doesnt matter but I just like to see them play bad. Defense wasnt good, first team offense couldnt move the ball and their vaulted WR corp drop balls all over the place.

Finally all the comedians are showing their faces.

I would say with a push mower (non self propeled) mowing 4 acres would great for the body.