CrackerDog

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Good. It'll be awesome to see him play and his getting some reps this year should be valuable in the future.

My point exactly, although you summarized it better. I agree 100%

Yeah, I guess I'm saying I wouldn't worry too much about his workload. He's been a horse for years and so it won't impact him much if the Bears bring him back for a few more years. If they more on, his workload won't matter at all. I'm sure he wants to showcase his talents as the season wraps up. If he didn't, he'd just take his current injury and ride it out for the rest of the year. He wants to tell other teams looking at him "I'm durable." If he decides a one year deal (maybe two) is all he needs to stay with the team, I hope the Bears hang onto him.

Does the SOS calc you're using take into account future games or just games to date? If it take into account future games and all else is equal, if we lose to Green Bay, I'm all for playing the rest of the season like it's next year's extended preseason. I didn't think we were this close to a top pick given all the absolutely shitty teams in the NFL this season.

Question... When you get to the point of the season you're playing guys with an eye toward the future, do you continue to play Forte? I do. Because we already know what we have in our other guys and Matt is: 1. Playing for his future contract, likely elsewhere 2. Less valuable to the Bears and therefore potentially the "better guy to get hurt" if it happens. Not that I want to see Matt leave nor do I want to see him hurt, but given his age and the likelihood of his leaving, I'd play it that way. Thoughts?

We'll just never agree on this one. I don't think the Bears "learned" anything of value yesterday and while they're surely working their way to better draft position and this season was a write-off in my mind before it started, I'd definitely love it if they had 2 of those 3 W's in close games they could've won, making their record good enough to still be in the hunt. We're not going to be bad enough to get a top 5 pick and once you get past that portion of the draft there's so many ways you can take your draft it almost doesn't matter whether you're picking ten, fifteen or twenty. The problem with the Lovie era wasn't the "meaningless wins" so much as the meaningless first round choices by Angelo. But whatever, I understand your point and respect it. There's definitely a school of thought that supports it. I just want to kick ass and let the chips fall where they may.

This team is 4-5 and with better closing efforts against Minnesota and Detroit, we're 6-3 and leading the division. Not saying this team isn't flawed because it is and they'd likely lose in the playoffs pretty quick. But the NFC is pretty lousy so who knows? Just WIN baby. Just win.

I hope someone rips Rodgers in half while his line is having a few, shall we say, "issues". God I hate that team...

It's absolute unmitigated BS. You're 100% right and I thought the same thing when I saw it. This is the legacy of one of the worst commissioners in the history of the NFL. He just has to tweak shit nobody cares about like making extra points into circus acts while not addressing clear issues with the rulebook. The announcers made it clear that NOBODY knows how to call these things anymore. It's getting to the point that the college game is much more appealing to me. If a 50 year old Bears fan for the last 45 years is feeling this way, the NFL better get their shit together.

BRING BACK LOVIE!!! Well, at least he always had good ST's and D. You're right, this group of coaches is excellent except for this one particular area. Not sure why they can't see what we all do. I'd fire the ST coach too.

Agreed with your first comments. The ONLY reason the ad makes any sense is because of Ditka's persona being so tied to the Bears. With that said, Ditka hasn't been "The Man" in quite some time. He had the right stuff for the early 80's but soon proved to not be the best coach. He had the talent on that team to do more than he did. Jimmy Mac always being hurt didn't help but he still should've done more. And after the Bears weren't the most talented team in the NFL, his coaching faltered. And his ego is, bar none, the biggest I've ever seen.

I agree with everything in this thread except the concept of winning a meaningless game. I want the team to win every Sunday. You build a winning attitude by winning. You get soft with excepting excuses and patting yourself on the back for a good try. There's no damn good reason the Bears shouldn't have won the last two games they played other than the defense cratered in the clutch. 2/3rds of the teams in the NFL just beg you to beat them week after week. They suck. It's the good teams that capitalize and do just that. While I think we're on the right path, and at the end of the day Jason might be right that this is a good loss in the long run, I cringe when I see the team happy with moral victories. They shouldn't accept failure so happily, nor should we as fans.

The dude sucks.

HE WAS OVER THE LINE!!!!

Well if he didn't learn from his mistakes in Denver I'm even more disappointed. And Gase was with him. On the road, in OT, you have to have some balls and be more aggressive with the play calling. This year is honestly a year for growth anyway so I'm not going to get too down on him. But there has to be improvement in all aspects of this team, including coaching.

Eli's numbers definitely went up last night. LOL!

I'll just add that Detroit's group of WR's are the biggest bunch of showboaters I can recall. The call on the field should've stood because there was absolutely NO compelling evidence to overturn it.

Good post. My thoughts are fairly similar. Not taking time outs to preserve some clock was ridiculous. And then the play calling for the offense in OT was even worse. That said, I still believe in this coaching staff but those two examples were Wanny-esq and I expect better. The failure to save time didn't hurt them much as Jay was able to make some great plays to get it into OT anyway. But damn.... The missed holding call in OT on Detroit was stunning. All day long these officials are calling anything and everything and then they miss the most obvious call the entire game. Officials aside, there's no excuse for losing this game. The Bears could've and should've won it DESPITE the horrible calls that went against them. A team further along the learning curve would've won this game.

You ought to bathe after something like that . Start with water, soap up, then rinse. Then we can all learn the difference between bath salts and sugar, btw I like skippy peanut butter.

AP currently ranks them at 20 which I'd say is fair except the Raiders don't belong above us. We just beat them last friggen week. This means the team is mediocre and hopefully improving. http://pro32.ap.org/poll

He also does a spot on WXRT radio on Monday morning. The dude sounds like a surfer.

100% agree. Which is why he needs to get his ass on the field. I'm sure he's feeling the pressure too.

One of them was successful but was called badly and then they ferked up the review process by not having the camera on the goal line. How the hell can an NFL crew not setup the cameras properly?

No question.