Stinger226

I like your choices except a RB in the fifth.

You say BPA and then blow up your own opinion by saying Watson is the third best player. He is not. He will get over drafted, but is a high risk choice anywhere in the first round. If we drafted him, I would be supportive but not sold on the pick.

We have two 4th round picks

I agree with you, over drafting a QB is common but not always smart. Because we draft a guy at 3, it does not make him more valuable but just a bigger risk.

We are always hopeful but these types dont usually workout.

Watson seems to have some tangibles that make him a winner, but I still do not think he is the third best player in the draft. I think watching one great game should not boost his status to must draft. His size, he is prone to interceptions. He struggles with some of the route tree throws. I am not sold on him. If we draft him, I will get on board, but not without trepidation. I know we have to draft a QB but value is key to drafting that high. If we draft him and he becomes a good starter type, it will work out, but I do not see him as a franchise QB as the top 5 or 6 in the league are. Buyer beware.

Look at GBN draft report and see there ratings , i find them to be realistic to my thoughts so far on the draft.( a former NFL scout)

I have seen Bolles in the first round im several mocks. I think if we got him in the second that would be a plus. Although Robinson and the Wis LT would be preferable, they wont make it out of the first round. One LT , I think may have huge upside would be Dion Dawkns from Temple. The more I read about him the more I think he end up being a starter either drafted in the 2nd or more likely the 3rd.

I think if Allen is there , he will be hard to pass up. He is prime time player. Even if Bullard turns out to be good, his high side is not close to Allen.

Because they suck, why wouldnt Cleveland take Garrett at one and then a QB at 12? Because they are at such a low in the franchise history, grabbing a QB would boast some hope to the fans.

I would love one of them two in the first I dont think watson will be there in the second Kelly in the third would be more realistic I would love to get a OT high, but doubt if Roberson or the Wisconsin LT would be there in the second. Have to get a FS with play making ability. Its a must.

If we go by your theory, Watson wont be there because everyone is trading up to get a QB. Also we give the 6th pic away, and our 2 4ths away to get a high second? that doesnt seem very smart of a deal.

They would taje BPA then naybe trade but no rb

They have hyde and no qb, why would they do that

So are you saying we should draft a RB?, I dont think that is a glaring need for us. Before I would do that I would reach for a LT than none are rated top 10 this year but would fix a glaring need.

I agree, there is no FA options, but if they think one of this years QBs are capable of being a Franchise QB then take him, but dont draft a high risk player at 3 because people expect you to do that. Take him if you want him , draft the BPA if you dont think there worth it.

I think bush ends up becoming the starter at SS, but the problem is it may not be this year..

I have heard rumors that McCoy(long time aide to Fox) could come here as the Assistant head coach. Do the play calling and still retain Loggians as OC with a lesser role. Why would McCoy do that? At Foxes age, he may turn the reigns to the team over to McCoy when his contract is up, and maybe Pace would agree with that depending on the success of the team until then. McCoy is viewed as a good offensive mind but has had the same problems that we have had here with many injuries and a poor defense. with Fangio here, the defense will become good if not great so it may we a great scenario for everybody involved.

your right, I didnt notice. I guess as long as you figured out what I meant, it doesnt really matter

We have two new CBs and the best FS in the game add a LT that can start from day one a legit TE a sleeper QB prospect Short will make our front 7 one of the top 7 in the league.

His stats dont set you on fire, but I have heard 3 NFL scouts say he has many traits to be a NFL starter. Nobody saying he is a franchise type but may be a good valve in the 4th or 5th.

I think he is a very good player, if we trade back and get some extra picks he would be a good valve

Lorenzo Jerome, S, Saint Francis (PA) he had 12 int and 24 PBUs over the last 3 years.

Cyprien? we need play makers, he has had two interceptions in 4 years. We can do better than that. Gilmore is quite the stud, 30 PDs and 8 int in the last two years. Allen would be great but didnt draft a QB, that will not happen this year.

From everything Im reading is this class is below average and have yet to here anybody call the top 3 a franchise quarterback. just because you draft a 2nd round rated QB higher doesnt make him a first round franchise QB. You are right most franchise QBs are drafted high, but they come out with fanfare, Manning, Luck, Ben Roethlisberger. QBs starting not in the first round. Dalton, 2nd round Wilson 3rd round Brady 6 th round Brees 2nd round Cousins 4 th round Tyrod Taylor 6 th round I am not going to list all the idiots around that have started some games because of injuries. More starters are found in the first round but also more misses. You can find them in other spots.