Jump to content

CrackerDog

Super Fans
  • Posts

    2,526
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CrackerDog

  1. I hope you’re wrong about this. The calls seemed to lessen as they analyzed the prior weeks. I think the way it’ll be called has already and will continue to evolve.
  2. In a first year for the new coaches and with Mitch still widely an unknown I’ll be satisfied with 8-8. That said, this team has playoff level talent and coaches so taking it to the next level in a single season wouldn’t surprise me.
  3. With all that guaranteed money I hope he doesn’t get fat and happy.
  4. https://mobile.twitter.com/Faux_Gruden/status/1035878915229863936?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^tweet
  5. LOL (in response to the big balls comment.) I like the addition but I’m always leery of signing a guy who refuses to sign with his current team. What’s he going to do to us next year? The cost of two firsts will be justified by his play. Pace is definitely going for the gold.
  6. I assume they have a deal with him in place already and aren’t just acquiring his rights. If true he’ll be on the field against GB. Other deal points are important too but not as important as that.
  7. Given that we’re still learning the new offense I completely disagree with this decision.
  8. I think they got a steal here.
  9. Jason definitely won’t agree.
  10. I like the new site. Big thanks to you. I don’t post much these days but enjoy reading everyone’s thoughts.
  11. Good. Now the worry warts can focus on something else...
  12. Couldn’t agree more. His play was pathetic. Not getting more pressure on the QB and the least creative offensive play calling I’ve seen in years is on these worthless coaches.
  13. Most of the low/high pass numbers were dictated by circumstance. Low-Gains needs to be fired.
  14. I’d add that keeping Trubisky in the pocket all day doesn’t really play to his strengths.
  15. Based on the results thus far does Pace deserve to be fired? Loggains? Fox? Glennon alone makes me a yes on Pace. And the way he got ass-mastered in moving up one pick. Fox is also already a yes for me but tough to judge him given the injuries we’ve seen. Loggains is gone. Unless Trubisky really blossoms under him which I don’t foresee. The kid is good but not good enough to make this clown look any better than John Shoop.
  16. I didn’t think any QB could make me miss Cutler. God he sucks.
  17. The way the question is framed the answer is Howard. I'm writing off this season so for me the answer to the bigger question is Trubisky getting experience.
  18. Guess I'm not the only one disappointed in our cutting Langford. Really feel he could spell Howard when needed while all these little backs are ok for a change of pace but not capable of playing three downs.
  19. Interesting that Fox switched things up for Thursday. Trubisky gets the start. Probably meaningless as to who starts week 1 but it'll give him more time with the starters before the season begins.
  20. I'm all for starting the season with Tru or going to him after a few games. He's putting up 7+ yards per attempt while Glennon is at 5.5. You can say he had easier defenses and you'd be right but I think getting him the most experience in his first year possible is going to be great for his future growth. Worked for Peyton. We mortgaged the future to get him, get him on the field! And Glennon's deal is really a one year. They overpaid for him but didn't exactly show a lot of confidence. We understand that now.
  21. Pace looks like smartest guy on the planet for Trubisky and a dumbshit for Glennon. What to make of it? Nothing in preseason game one. But if this continues and the results are consistent with what we've seen so far? Head scratcher.
×
×
  • Create New...