adam

Please god no, but you are right, he has a great shot.

I think we should keep Brown and sign him to an incentive laden deal. Something that involves # of snaps or games played.

Yes, but barely. If they win they would also be 7-9, making it 7 teams at that record. We would pick 15th in the first, and then pick 9th in the 7th. If they lost, we would pick 15th again in the 7th. So not much of an impact. An Arizona win actually helps more.

Our new inter division rivals. We play them again next year.

There was an article about this recently. Parrish from Buffalo just got extended, so you have to believe the Bears do it now. He is only going to continue to get more expensive. Now is the time to lock him up.

That is true, and to think teams kicked away from him, and he still broke his own record. He should own the All-Time return record sometime next year, in only his 3rd year. Amazing.

Based on a #15 First Round Pick, the Bears would have the following picks: #15 #44 #75 #90 (from SD) #106 #151 (from CAR) #182 (Approximate due to supplemental picks) #225 (Approximate due to supplemental picks)

Thank god. I thought you were looking at something completely different. I am looking at it and seeing everyone slide up one slot until the top, then dropping off - and you were saying the complete opposite. LOL.

Yeah, I would love to move down into the 20's and add a 2nd rounder. That would be sweet.

What? How would the Bears jump 7 spots in the 2nd round? This isn't fantasy football. All they move up is one position per round. So if they select 16th, they will have the 15th selection of the 2nd, 14th of the 3rd, etc.

11 Return TDs in 2 seasons. Silly. That doesn't even include his FG return last year. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3173810

I agree. I was saying in terms of actually performance compared to the rest of the team.

Head to Head is not even a discriminant. That is weird:

It says that after overall record, the next factor is SoS. The team with the easier schedule with the same record is actually the worse team. That is how it has been unless it has changed recently.

True, this will be something to watch. I assume they would do it right away.

I am just hoping someone falls into our laps at #15/16.

Who has more of an impact on a game with so few touches?

Yes, here is the breakdown: 9. DEN (6-9, SoS #11) 10. CIN (7-9, SoS #27) 11. NO (7-9, SoS #24) 12. CAR (7-9, SoS #22) 13. BUF (7-9, SoS #9) 14. DET (7-9, SoS #7) 15. CHI (7-9, SoS #2) 16. ARZ (7-8, SoS #30) 17. HOU (8-8, SoS #17) 18. PHI (8-8, SoS #1) Now ARZ is interesting. If they lose, they go from #16 to #10, and possibly #9 with a DEN win.

He should even get a vote or two for MVP. He has the biggest impact on a game in the NFL. Screw Brady, he would not be half the QB without the OL and Moss/Welker.

I hope not. A little late I hope.

Depending on the Arizona game, the Bears will draft 15th or 16th. 15th with an Arizona win, and 16th with an Arizona loss.

Repost: http://www.talkbears.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=1626

Manning looked great, but once again, when he is pressured, he gets flustered. That fumble and 3 and out followed by the INT sealed it for NE. Also, the Moss TD was silly. Everyone knew they were going right back to him, yet he was single covered by a Safety with a bad hamstring?

Ugh, Manning really choked in the 2nd half. 2 minute offense burns 3 minutes off the clock - classic.

You needed a choice for "Giants because I hate NE/Boston"